<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Affidavit on Chez unrolls</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/tags/affidavit/</link><description>Recent content in Affidavit on Chez unrolls</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>ChezRD</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:00:00 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://threads.chez.work/en/tags/affidavit/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Ashurkov's Interview</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/ashurkov-interview/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:00:00 +0300</pubDate><guid>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/ashurkov-interview/</guid><description>The London School of Bullshittery</description></item><item><title>Zheleznyakgate. Part One.</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/zheleznyakgate-part-one/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 03:05:49 +0300</pubDate><guid>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/zheleznyakgate-part-one/</guid><description>I set out to compile, in chronological order, every on‑record mention of Alexander Zheleznyak or Sergey Leontiev I could find on YouTube and add context that many may have missed due to the lack of adequate coverage.</description></item><item><title>Solodkiy slipped up again</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/solodkiy-gave-himself-away/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 09:11:49 +0300</pubDate><guid>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/solodkiy-gave-himself-away/</guid><description>By the way, Nerses rightly pointed out to me this morning that here Solodkiy slipped up again, admitting that Leontyev was not involved in the “Navalny’s card” project.</description></item><item><title>The importance of Ashurkov’s affidavit</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/findings/vazhnost-affidavita/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:48:49 +0300</pubDate><guid>https://threads.chez.work/en/findings/vazhnost-affidavita/</guid><description>Why did Vladimir Ashurkov’s sworn statement, as FBK’s executive director, become decisive in the Probusinessbank case? We break down how a single witness helped avoid a hearing on the merits under the pretext of “political persecution,” and what that meant for depositors.</description></item><item><title>Ashurkov’s Affidavit and the Navalny Card</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/affidavit-ashurkova-and-navalny-card/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 12:32:49 +0300</pubDate><guid>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/affidavit-ashurkova-and-navalny-card/</guid><description>Once again (hopefully for the last time) I’m writing a thread about the “Navalny Card,” about Ashurkov’s “affidavit,” and how bankers use Vladislav Solodkiy’s story.</description></item><item><title>Ashurkov lied about Navalny’s bank card</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/ashurkov-lied-about-navalny-card/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:16:49 +0300</pubDate><guid>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/ashurkov-lied-about-navalny-card/</guid><description>You didn’t ask, but I’ll repeat it: Vladimir Ashurkov lied in his affidavit about the “Navalny card.” That testimony underpins the defense narrative of Zheleznyak, Leontiev, and Lomov—to avoid repayment of the stolen funds.</description></item></channel></rss>