<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Zayakin on Chez unrolls</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/tags/zayakin/</link><description>Recent content in Zayakin on Chez unrolls</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>ChezRD</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 03:05:49 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://threads.chez.work/en/tags/zayakin/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Zheleznyakgate. Part One.</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/zheleznyakgate-part-one/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 03:05:49 +0300</pubDate><guid>https://threads.chez.work/en/posts/zheleznyakgate-part-one/</guid><description>I set out to compile, in chronological order, every on‑record mention of Alexander Zheleznyak or Sergey Leontiev I could find on YouTube and add context that many may have missed due to the lack of adequate coverage.</description></item><item><title>Theft, Not ‘Risk Shifting’ — Debunking Misleading Narratives</title><link>https://threads.chez.work/en/findings/probiznesbank-khishchenie-a-ne-risk-shifting/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:20:49 +0300</pubDate><guid>https://threads.chez.work/en/findings/probiznesbank-khishchenie-a-ne-risk-shifting/</guid><description>In an article by ‘The Insider’ and in an interview between Andrey Zayakin and Alexander Plyushchev, two questionable narratives emerged about the asset diversion from Probusinessbank. The first — about alleged ‘risk shifting’, the second — about the impossibility of confirming theft due to the ‘disappearance without a trace’ of the money. Here’s why this was not risk shifting but straightforward theft, backed by legally structured offshore schemes, and why such claims raise serious questions.</description></item></channel></rss>